Monday, December 28th, 2009
If a hospital patient dies from flu contracted at the hospital, should all unvaccinated workers at that hospital be indicted for negligent homicide?
For non-health-care workers, vaccination is a personal decision. But for health-care workers, not getting vaccinated is gross negligence and fraud – unless they work at a small clinic with a big sign saying “Warning! – workers here have not been vaccinated – they might give you flu!’
Monday, 28. December 2009
The idea that a unvaccinated person whether they are a health worker or not is not going to fly as there are to many folks that pass along germs daily that includes you or I. As for the person that spoke about the rushing of a vaccine to market before testing fully is either a fool or just plain doesn’t get it.
The swine flu vaccine that was used in the 70s did have a reaction. I was a health worker at that time in the military and knew of just one case of Gillian Beret as a direct result of the flu shot. What he did not say was how many lives may have been saved because of the use of the vaccine.
I would also point out that Polio, and smallpox have all but been eradicated because of vaccines.
I would also tell you that most likely more folks had an adverse reaction to aspirin. Oh maybe he would be opposed to that also.
20 years nursing in the military
Monday, 28. December 2009
Frankly as far as I’m concerned they should be commended for their good sense that they don’t get vaccinated. Vaccines are dangerous, and back in the 70’s the flu vaccine was again rushed to market without adequate testing. Consequently the vaccine proved more dangerous than the flu. There are many dangerous effects to vaccines no matter what the CDC would have you believe, and anyone with a strong immune system doesn’t have any worries. Healthy people will get the flu and get over it and be immune to that strain. Anything else is simply natural selection, as it should be.
Besides, if you were to get the flu and pass it on to someone else who ultimately died from it, should YOU then be indicted for negligent homicide?
Monday, 28. December 2009
I would be more inclined to agree with the first answerer as what I’ve experienced has caused me to mistrust the medical community and their slavery to big pharma. The Dr’s are paid by the large pharmaceutical companies to continue to promote their products and pump us full of medications with little regard to consequences. If you read the first link I post, it counters that polio and smallpox were in fact not eradicated with vaccines, but instead were spread more because of vaccines. The other poisons that are put into our systems with vaccines such as aluminum and mercury are not poisons I would want myself, or my children exposed to, yet we are told these vaccines are safe despite evidence to the contrary. Mercury accumulates in the body. Once it’s in there, it’s in there forever. The medical community doesn’t have a handle on the facts, and until they are really ready to give full disclosure and educate the public on the dangers of these medications, I would prefer to bolster immunity naturally. The following articles are only the tip of the iceberg of misinformation we have been given over the years.
As far as aspirin goes, I don’t think you can compare the ill effects of salicates to the ill effects of mercury compounds and other heavy metals.
As to the original question, I was told once that there was a time we actually had laws on the books that allowed for legal action to be taken against those that had exposed us to disease, but those sort of laws have become outdated. If we could take legal action against those who passed diseases on to us, the courts would be tied up with such cases and how could you possibly prove that any given person exposed you to any given ailment? Such an idea simply wouldn’t have any merit.